60 Minutes has long been considered a “gold standard” of journalism – it is currently airing its 57th season and reaches more than 10 million viewers. The recent broadcast included interviews with former U.S. State Dept. officials critical of American support for Israel but without properly including opposing viewpoints. Their opinions were presented as news. The officials alleged that the U.S. was directly responsible for the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza – rather than Hamas.
One of the former State Dept. officials resigned in protest only 10 days after the 10/7 atrocities and told a 60 Minutes producer that Israel should have pursued a peace deal immediately after the Hamas assault, rather than holding the terrorists accountable. He then joined an organization that supports the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement against Israel’s existence and opposed the Abraham Accords peace agreements between Israel and Islamic nations.
Another official served as a speaker at Council on American-Islamic Relations events. She has falsely accused Israel of committing genocide and ethnic cleansing in Gaza. CAIR was declared an unindicted co-conspirator by the U.S. Justice Dept. in a major 2008 Hamas terrorism financing case.
Criticism of Anti-Israel Media Bias: ‘Media needs to do better’
Outgoing U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Jack Lew, was highly critical of the news media’s coverage of Hamas and Israel in an interview before the 60 Minutes story aired – and warned about the impact of this war on future U.S. policymakers: “America has been fed a media coverage of this war” that Hamas has effectively controlled. “The American media uses language like, ‘the Palestinian Health Authority [Hamas] reports and the IDF claims.’ I think ‘claims’ is a little bit arch for a trusted ally. You could say they ‘say.’”
Chair of Urban Warfare Studies at the U.S. Military Academy, John Spencer, condemned the “misinformation and vilification” of the Israeli military by 60 Minutes and its use of data from a non-governmental organization that uses “unaccepted methods to determine casualty estimates.” The NGO admits that it assumes all deaths in Gaza are civilians – unless there is evidence confirming they are militants. CBS News also relied on data from a prestigious British medical journal long-known for its repeated anti-Israel bias. A recently debunked Lancet article reported more civilian deaths than even Hamas reported.
ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt: “I’m outraged that CBS News’ 60 Minutes would air such a biased and one-sided piece, villainizing Israel and berating U.S. support for its ally. Where are the counter perspectives to those interviewed? Where is the mention of the nearly 100 hostages – including Americans – STILL in captivity!? What kind of journalism is that? Major media outlets all need to do better.”
|