Rabbi Sacks: The Arabs Are Our Cousins, Not The Muslims
By Sheri Oz
Allow me to correct Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks. Presumptuous of me? Perhaps. I love reading what Rabbi Sacks writes, so let me just offer a little tweak to something he wrote.
In a recent piece that he called “On Judaism and Islam“, he wrote:
It sounds really wonderful. But Ishmael was not a Muslim, he was an Arab.
In Israel, Jews often call Arabs “cousin” and that is because, as Arabs, they are our cousins. They are not our cousins by virtue of them being Muslims. We do not call Malaysians or Pakistanis cousin because, while they are Muslims, they are not Arabs. In short, we do not call any of the Muslims who are not Arab, cousin. And we would call any Arab, regardless of his or her religious affiliation, cousin. It is just that simple.
While Muslims around the world may consider Abraham as their spiritual father, that does not make them the offspring of Abraham, the father of Isaac and Ishmael. There were no Muslims in Biblical times. I feel I need to repeat that, in case it is not quite clear. There were no Muslims in Biblical times. Ishmael was not a Muslim. Therefore, the Ishmael that reconciled with Isaac and stood beside him at the grave of their father — he was not a Muslim.
It is a belief in Islam that any land they ever controlled must remain Muslim land forever after, regardless of who was there before and who managed to fight back and regain sovereignty afterward. Likewise, they claim ownership over people from before Mohammad ever walked the Earth. They retroactively claim Ishmael as a Muslim. Islam is their faith, and they can define it however they want. They can make it out to have been Ishmael that was about to be sacrificed rather than Isaac, too.
Cousins often remember their family histories differently. They can either laugh about these contradictory stories or they can fight about them and become estranged. Families have a logic all their own.
In short, our conflict with the Arabs is a family issue.
Our conflict with non-Arab Muslims is a community issue – at most an issue of dealing with the families of in-laws, those who married into the family, so to speak. Blood connections are stronger (not always better, as anyone with a family knows, but innately stronger unless a conscious decision is taken making it otherwise).
What this means for me, reflecting on the image of Isaac and Ishmael standing together to mourn their father, is that we can work toward reconciliation with our cousins, the Arabs, and leave the rest of the Muslim world to decide how they want to relate to that. I am not really up to taking on the whole Muslim world, nor with reconciling with peoples that have decided they have a say over what happens in my house just because they joined the extended family.
Originally published here
FOOD FOR THOUGHT
Many people forget that Abraham was the father of both Jews and Arabs. God’s promise to Abraham that his children would be numerous like the stars in the sky came true – only the large portion of those children are not Jewish.
Our relationship with Arabs pre-dates Islam. If we do not understand our own history, how can we develop a more positive, healthy and safe relationship with our Arab cousins in the future?
It is crucial to understand that not all Muslims are Arabs and not all Arabs are Muslims.
In the same vein, it is important to realize that not all Jews are Ashkenazi Jews who have developed under the influence of European culture. Why do so many people forget / not realize that there are Jews who lived for centuries in Arab countries and have many of the same cultural habits, preferences, and values?
Who benefits from the erasure of Jewish history in Arab lands? What political narrative is furthered by the idea that all Jews are European? How does this reflect on the understanding of Jewish indigeneity to Israel?